Skip to main content

    Tariff Cascade Simulator

    Canada and the United States do not mainly trade finished goods, they build them together, so a single component can cross the border several times before final assembly. Each crossing is a separate customs event assessed on a cost base that already contains earlier duty. This model walks a notional component through that sequence and reports the effective burden, the retail price effect, and how much of the cost lands on producer margin rather than on the buyer. Deterministic scenario model with stated assumptions, not live data and not advice.

    Tariff Cascade Simulator
    Scenario model, not live data

    A continental component rarely crosses the border once. Set the terms and the model walks a notional $1,000 input through each crossing, applying duty to a cost base that already contains the duty paid at the previous stage.

    Effective tariff burden

    32.3%

    against a headline rate of 15 per cent, a cascade premium of 17.3%

    Added cost per unit

    $508

    $305 to the buyer, $203 to the producer

    Retail price effect

    +8.7%

    on a finished good priced from the same component

    Operating margin left

    5.6%

    from a 9 per cent starting margin, 3.4% compression

    Cost accumulation by crossing
    Cross 1
    $1,201
    Cross 2
    $1,443
    Cross 3
    $1,733
    Cross 4
    $2,081

    Untaxed cost base at the same number of stages: $1,574. Duty collected across all crossings: $393. Administrative drag: $43.

    Where the burden lands, largest channel first
    1
    Household prices60 weight
    Pass through to the shelf or showroom
    2
    Producer margin40 weight
    Absorbed to defend market share
    3
    Export volume24 weight
    Lost orders from retaliatory measures
    4
    Administrative drag8 weight
    Brokerage, documentation and border delay
    Export volume at risk

    11.8%

    Employment response lag

    9 mo

    Survivable but structural. Producers can hold the relationship only by giving up most of their margin, which defers rather than avoids the price increase.

    Fixed assumptions, stated so they can be argued with: value added is 12 per cent at each processing stage, the finished good prices at 2.4 times component cost, administrative cost is 0.8 per cent of value at each crossing, and the starting operating margin on the finished good is 9 per cent. Duty is applied to the cost base carried forward, which is how cascade arises. Drawback, duty deferral and preferential origin claims reduce the cascade in practice and are excluded here so the mechanism is visible. This is a scenario model with illustrative inputs, not a forecast, not a quotation and not advice.